In the realm of infrastructure and community improvements, the meeting delved into several significant grant applications. The council discussed a CDBG grant application aimed at making the municipal building’s entrance ADA compliant, which included the installation of an automatic door and removal of a step, with a total potential grant award of $200,000. The necessity and urgency of the improvements were deliberated, alongside considerations for the broader scope of ADA compliance across municipal properties.

The council also reviewed projects funded through grants from the county and the DCA. The recreation center improvements, with a price tag of $662,000, were discussed, as well as the Main Street improvement project, which included the replacement of sidewalks and addition of amenities. These projects were part of larger discussions about infrastructure development, which included a debate on the proposed improvements to Main Street, such as sidewalk replacements and aesthetic enhancements. The cost implications, particularly the potential impact on underground utilities, were estimated to reach up to one million dollars per block, sparking conversations about financial feasibility and design choices.

Furthermore, plans to extend the promenade from Third Avenue to the Avon Boardwalk raised the issue of funding for a project estimated to cost between 12 to 15 million dollars. The inclusion of ADA beach access and the integration of amenities like benches and lighting were part of the proposed design. A grant for the rehabilitation of a failing bulkhead near the east side of the beach was also discussed.

During the public comments section, residents expressed their thoughts on various topics. The proposed changes to the ordinance regarding public comments during council meetings sparked debate, with some council members suggesting a reduction of speaking time from five to three minutes to streamline meetings. However, this proposal was met with concerns from both council members and residents, who highlighted the importance of maintaining transparency and providing a platform for resident questions.

The public also voiced opinions on various development projects. Concerns were raised about the potential giveaway of a valuable lot on Lorraine Avenue for affordable housing, the lack of notice and public input, and the need for deed restrictions. Additionally, the renewal of a local establishment’s liquor license brought up issues related to its outdoor tent, parking, noise, and waste management, revealing community concerns about the impact of business practices on residential areas.

Another notable discussion surrounded the potential sale of a church property, which residents urged the council to reconsider, emphasizing transparency and the maximization of profit through subdivision into lots. This was coupled with a call for clarity on fees associated with certain agenda items and the desire for more control over future property use.

The meeting also featured updates on the reopening of the Bradley Food Pantry, the success of the Memorial Day Parade, and upcoming library and recreation events. A debate emerged regarding the bargaining and contract negotiations with the local union, highlighting concerns about employee retention and council involvement in the negotiation process.

The public comments section further underscored issues of transparency and accountability. Residents questioned legal charges from the borough, the status of the 2022 audit, and allegations of mismanagement. Criticisms of the council’s handling of legal disputes, event planning, and financial transparency were also voiced, as well as dissatisfaction with the borough’s website and the maintenance of public spaces.