One notable issue discussed was the complex balance between increasing retail and market spaces within the proposed development and ensuring adequate parking. The proposed mix-use project on Monq Avenue sparked a debate, with concerns about the potential loss of parking spaces due to the development and its impact on traffic flow, especially during school peak times. Members considered various solutions, including the implementation of metered parking and the suggestion of a combination of licensing spaces and internal ramps.

Another topic was the financial aspects of the development, including the request for a PILOT agreement. The PILOT, or Payment In Lieu Of Taxes, is a financial tool that municipalities use to attract development but can have long-term implications for municipal revenues. The members recognized the need for further negotiation on this matter, considering the potential impact on the town’s finances.

Furthermore, the agency delved into the specifics of the proposed building design. The discussion covered the size of the building, the number of parking spaces in relation to the total number of units, and the addition of an EV station. There were also talks about the unit count, courtyard layout, gym size, and the visual impact of elevation plans and renderings on the area. Safety and traffic concerns related to the proposed exit location were debated as well.

The Civil aspects of the project, such as parking, tree scapes, and a proposal for drainage systems, were also a focal point. Members highlighted the need for variances, including zero yard setback, 97% building coverage, 100% impervious coverage, and a height of 68 ft 6 stories. The high percentage of building coverage raised concerns about the lack of green space, although the architect explained that the courtyard design would mitigate the impact.

One innovative solution discussed was the implementation of a green roof to address storm water issues on buildings with 100% coverage. Members weighed the benefits against concerns over the longevity and maintenance of such a roof. Additionally, the use of PEX air conditioning vents was questioned in terms of noise levels and quality compared to central air systems.

Traffic issues and the layout of the dog park were also addressed. The possibility of restricting left turns during peak hours to alleviate congestion was suggested. The architect provided details on the dog park’s dimensions and sanitary measures. Concerns were raised about the potential misuse of unassigned parking spots, prompting discussions on how to manage electric vehicle spaces effectively.

Retail space allocation was a recurring theme, with the potential relocation of electric meters to increase available retail space and the suggestion to offer leasing opportunities to existing retail businesses to maintain economic vibrancy. The aesthetics and functionality of retail doors, the durability of stucco, and the need for recessed entrances for safety were also discussed.