St. Francis School Board Grapples with Book Review Policy and Federal-Local Immigration Conflicts

In a recent meeting, the St. Francis Area School Board addressed topics including a book review policy that some feel undermines local authority, potential conflicts between federal and state regulations, and protocols for handling federal immigration agents on school grounds. The discussion also touched on student achievements and community engagement.

0:06The meeting’s most substantial discussion revolved around Policy 66.5 and its impact on local decision-making regarding educational materials. Mr. Ryan K, president of Education Minnesota St. Francis, presented his concerns that the current policy limits the school board’s authority. He pointed out that the book review committee’s decisions effectively bypass local input, which he argued is important for maintaining community values. Mr. K emphasized the need for the board to reclaim its decision-making power over book content. He concluded by urging the board to reconsider the policy, expressing confidence in their ability to address potentially controversial materials.

12:53This issue prompted a request to the state attorney general for clarification. The Minnesota State High School League has 60 days to finalize related decisions, with more information expected to be shared once a decision is reached.

The board also discussed protocols for handling situations involving federal agents, particularly from ICE, on school grounds. While the likelihood of such events in the district remains low, the importance of having established procedures was underscored. Draft procedures were reviewed, focusing on preventing unauthorized access during school hours and ensuring any warrants presented by immigration officials are managed appropriately. The board highlighted the critical distinction between judicial and administrative warrants, noting that strict compliance would be followed for judicial ones. Protecting student rights and privacy was a recurring theme, with an emphasis on limiting personal information sharing unless sanctioned by the superintendent’s office.

In addition to policy discussions, the board addressed routine but essential administrative matters. The approval of the teacher seniority list for the 2024-2025 academic year was finalized, following necessary corrections. This list plays a role in future decisions regarding unrequested leave, and the motion to approve was passed without opposition.

Board members also shared reports from various activities and meetings. One member recounted their experience volunteering at a dance event, which attracted a large student turnout despite chilly weather conditions. Another member reported on a policy committee meeting, noting that two policies were discussed, with one set for a first read in the upcoming meeting. Discussions on teacher evaluations and changes affecting English as a Second Language programs were also highlighted, alongside the impending rollout of a new evaluation system by July 1, 2024. The potential elimination of Q Comp was mentioned.

Community engagement was a focal point as well, with board members expressing gratitude for the support shown during recent cancer awareness events linked to basketball and wrestling. Positive feedback was shared from a community member who benefited from a financial guidance program offered through community education, highlighting the program’s impact on individuals facing challenges.

0:06The meeting concluded with members transitioning to a work session focused on the school board member handbook, which was not recorded according to current policy. A brief break preceded this session, and the meeting was adjourned following a unanimous motion.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: