One item was the application from Divine Mercy Healing Center, Inc., which aimed to continue the use of a property as a retreat center. The property, previously used by the Little Sisters of the Poor, was subject to intense scrutiny as the board examined whether it qualified as a lawfully created pre-existing non-conforming use. The board debated whether the site’s historical use as a retreat center could be substantiated before the current zoning ordinances took effect. It was noted that the property had been utilized by the Little Sisters since 1973, but the board concluded this did not suffice to establish a pre-existing non-conforming use under the law.

A significant aspect of the application was the proposed increase in retreats from eight to ten annually to approximately 30, which the board considered an intensification of the property’s use. This potential increase raised concerns about traffic, parking, and public safety. Board members highlighted that no permits were on record for renovations made in the 1980s, adding to their skepticism about the property’s legal status as a retreat center. Without documentation proving the property’s lawful transition from a convent to a retreat center before zoning regulations, the board expressed doubts about the validity of the applicant’s claims.

Concerns over public health and safety were paramount, with board members discussing the potential for increased traffic and parking demands. Questions about fire safety and the absence of community input during past renovations contributed to the decision to deny the application. A motion was unanimously passed to deny the application, with the board suggesting that Divine Mercy Healing Center, Inc. could pursue a D1 use variance with a comprehensive site plan and professional input from a planner and engineer.

Following the decision on the retreat center, the board turned its attention to other matters. Notably, G7B LLC’s application for a drive-thru coffee shop on New Jersey Route 31 was approved, with a resolution granting a D1 use variance, five C2 variances, and a preliminary and final site plan approval. The board addressed a minor edit to the resolution, correcting a name discrepancy, and proceeded with a vote in favor, except for one member attending remotely.

The meeting also covered time extension applications for CE Main Street LLC and Shanty LLC, both of which sought extensions for obtaining zoning and construction permits. CE Main Street LLC required additional time due to complications with electric service agreements, while Shanty LLC faced delays related to septic system approvals. The board granted both extensions, emphasizing the importance of adhering to conditions set in previous resolutions.

Additionally, a discussion on the Fudge Shop Land Group’s application for minor site plan and variance relief revealed the need for a consolidated application, as a third lot had not been previously included. The board agreed to dismiss the current application without prejudice to facilitate resubmission.