The board’s most engaging topic revolved around the property at the corner of Hot Street and Pleasant Street, where a boundary dispute raised questions about the true acreage of the land. Confusion stemmed from a 2015 decision by the Board of Selectmen, which altered the landscape by eliminating a cut across the property. This decision led to uncertainty about whether the land belonged to the corner house’s owners or neighboring property owners. The board recognized the significance of resolving this issue, as the property size directly affects tax obligations and legal standing.

Members discussed the potential need for a “quiet title action,” a legal mechanism in Massachusetts to resolve disputes when multiple parties claim ownership. It was suggested that a survey could be necessary to clarify the boundaries and establish the rightful owner. However, differing opinions emerged regarding the role of the Registry of Deeds and the documentation required to amend the deed, which currently records the property as two and a half acres. The possibility of re-filing the deed to reflect a corrected size of one and a half acres was considered, though concerns about the Registry’s scrutiny and the potential impact on property value were raised.

The debate also touched on the implications of title insurance in resolving such disputes. If the property owner had title insurance, boundary issues might be addressed without additional financial burden, provided ownership was contested. Ultimately, the board agreed that the property owner should either pursue a new deed filing or a survey to accurately define the boundaries. Changes to the property’s official records would depend on updated documentation provided by the owner.

In addition to the boundary topic, the board addressed several financial matters, including the approval of motor vehicle excise tax abatements for multiple years. Collectively, these abatements amounted to significant sums, with $63,242 for 2026, $13,287 for 2025, and lesser amounts for previous years. Each motion to approve and sign these abatements passed without discussion.

Another financial matter involved the approval of the Dighton Sewer Enterprise Inter, which included a sewer loan interest of $27,351. This motion, too, passed unanimously.

These exemptions were approved with minimal discussion.