The proposal to allow seafood processing in Chelsea’s industrial district emerged as a key focus of the meeting. Historically, seafood processing in the area had been constrained by zoning regulations, which classified it as a water-dependent use, permissible only in waterfront-adjacent districts. The current amendment aims to rectify this by allowing these activities under a special permit, thereby granting the city oversight over future applications. This change is positioned as a potential driver for economic growth, promising significant job creation and tax base enhancement.

A representative from Boston Provisions, a company interested in relocating to Chelsea, presented their business model centered on protein processing and distribution, primarily seafood and meat, without cooking or curing processes. This business move could bring over 150 jobs initially, with potential growth to 300 positions within two years. The company highlighted minimal environmental impact, assuring the board that the processing facility would not generate odors or significant pollution. Additionally, Boston Provisions plans to operate with small box trucks, exploring electric vehicle options to mitigate environmental concerns.

The board expressed cautious optimism about the proposal, noting the long vacancy of the building in question and the potential benefits of reactivating it. However, they emphasized the importance of community engagement, particularly given Chelsea’s limited pedestrian access to the waterfront. Suggestions were made for Boston Provisions to consider a retail component to enhance public interaction with the area.

Simultaneously, the board delved into a proposed zoning amendment concerning accessory dwelling units (ADUs), which are being promoted as a solution to the housing crisis. The Affordable Homes Act mandates that municipalities permit ADUs by right in single-family zoning districts starting February 2nd of next year. Chelsea currently lacks specific regulations for ADUs, prompting the introduction of a draft amendment to establish guidelines. This draft restricts ADUs to one per lot, prohibits short-term rentals, and imposes design review and parking requirements.

The discussion revealed complexities in implementing ADU regulations, particularly concerning the calculation of maximum unit size and adherence to zoning codes. The draft amendment stipulates that an ADU may not exceed half the gross floor area of the principal dwelling or 900 square feet, whichever is smaller. Concerns were raised about the practicality of these requirements, especially given Chelsea’s small lot sizes, which might render construction of ADUs challenging for many property owners.

Community members voiced concerns about potential environmental impacts, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of air quality and waste management in relation to both proposed amendments. The conversation also touched on the city’s infrastructure capacity, with suggestions to involve the Department of Public Works and other relevant departments to evaluate the adequacy of existing sewer and water systems to handle potential new developments.

The board acknowledged the necessity of awaiting further guidance from the state before finalizing ADU regulations. The state’s recent release of guidelines left local officials uncertain about compliance, prompting a motion to recommend postponing hearings on the draft amendments until state guidelines are finalized. This motion was seconded and carried unanimously.