MA County
- Filters
- MA
- Hampshire County
- 3/4/25
- 03/05/2025
- 182 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent meeting of the Southampton Select Board, a portion was dedicated to addressing citizen concerns regarding property issues and the actions of the Board of Health. The board also discussed updates on various town projects, budgetary plans, and potential changes to local bylaws.
- MA
- Hampshire County
- 3/3/25
- 03/06/2025
- 43 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Amherst Historical Commission meeting on March 3, 2025, centered on a public hearing to consider a demolition application for a carriage house located on North Pleasant Street. The structure, dating back to approximately 1890, faces potential demolition due to its deteriorating condition, prompting a complex discussion about preservation, historical significance, and practical considerations.
- MA
- Hampshire County
- 3/3/25
- 03/05/2025
- 88 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Granby Select Board meeting on March 3rd primarily revolved around finalizing the contract for the new Town Administrator, alongside discussions on the Town’s interim administration, the appointment of a Building Commissioner, and infrastructure updates. Adjustmentsmendments were made to the contract.
- MA
- Hampshire County
- 2/27/25
- 02/28/2025
- 248 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent meeting, the Amherst Town Council grappled with issues surrounding accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and solar installation regulations, focusing on aligning local bylaws with state guidelines and addressing public engagement strategies. The sessions highlighted the challenges of balancing state mandates with community needs while ensuring clear communication with residents.
- MA
- Hampshire County
- 2/27/25
- 02/28/2025
- 44 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Granby Select Board meeting on February 27th centered on the intricate legalities and procedural challenges surrounding a gravel permit application from LJ Development LLC. The applicant, represented by James and Kathy Slate, was advised to withdraw their application without prejudice due to the inability to secure a unanimous vote from the board, a requirement under Massachusetts law. This decision followed discussions on the eligibility of board members to vote and the necessity of various studies to assess the environmental impact of the proposed gravel operation.
