04:12During the meeting, Bill Lunaman, a department representative, explained that the Division of Consumer Affairs directed municipalities to eliminate the term “Certificate of Occupancy” for residential resales, necessitating the change. He assured that the ordinance is not a revenue-generating measure but a safety protocol for property transactions. Lunaman clarified that permits for installations like hot water heaters would be required only if completed during the current ownership and emphasized mechanisms for vulnerable populations, such as offering a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for homes sold “as is.”

07:51Residents and council members raised concerns about the potential financial burden on sellers, especially regarding inspection costs. Lunaman acknowledged these concerns but highlighted the ordinance’s focus on mitigating risks associated with poorly executed renovations, particularly amid increasing complaints about house flipping activities. Discussions also included the possibility of a grace period for those already under contract when the ordinance is enacted, allowing such transactions to proceed without additional inspections.

20:42During the public comment session, residents voiced varied opinions on the ordinance. Some questioned Lunaman’s role within the township, while others highlighted perceived redundancies with existing codes. A resident, Angie from Princeton Drive, criticized the need for new permits after inspections.” Another resident, Pat Pomerans, advocated for clear communication and transparency, proposing a checklist for homeowners and realtors to understand what would be inspected.

35:28The discussion revealed a divide between those advocating for less government interference and those supporting the ordinance’s safety intentions. Residents expressed a desire for clearer communication and fairness in the ordinance’s implementation.

53:37In addition to the ordinance debate, the council considered increasing police department staffing. The acting Chief of Police cited a rise in service calls as justification for increasing officers from 32 to 35. The Chief outlined challenges in recruiting and retaining officers, noting competitive salaries in neighboring towns as a hurdle. Council members acknowledged the need to address salary disparities and the lengthy training process for new recruits, with discussions planned for future budget considerations.

01:04:57Budget discussions took center stage with Ordinance 2025, which involves appropriating $4.2 million for utility system improvements. Residents raised concerns about the high costs and the necessity of spending such amounts on small township sections. The council explained that issues with existing laterals necessitated additional budget allocations, and the bidding process aims to identify the lowest responsible bidder.

01:00:11Public comments highlighted the need for improved infrastructure and fiscal responsibility. Residents called for better budgeting practices and contractor selection processes, emphasizing the importance of infrastructure projects for the township’s growth. The council responded by detailing its procedures for contractor selection and project budgeting, yet residents remained apprehensive about the measures’ sufficiency.

Traffic management and safety concerns were also raised, particularly regarding increased traffic due to infrastructure work. Residents expressed apprehensions about heavy trucks on inadequate roads, highlighting safety implications for students and potential road damage. The council discussed coordination efforts with utility companies to minimize disruptions and acknowledged the necessity of long-term infrastructure improvements.

01:45:17Residents were encouraged to participate in upcoming community events, including an Easter egg hunt and local clean-up efforts.