The tree preservation ordinance sparked discussion, particularly regarding its language and enforcement. One of the primary concerns was the ordinance’s allowance for developers to remove trees if they paid a fee into the Fair Haven shade tree trust reserve fund. Critics argued this could lead to excessive tree removal, undermining the community’s environmental and aesthetic goals. A council member voiced dissatisfaction, contending that the ordinance should prioritize tree protection over financial considerations, challenging the notion that homeowners could remove trees simply for convenience.

The council also discussed the ordinance’s definitions, particularly the classification of trees versus shrubs and the implications for tree replacement. Ambiguities about who qualifies as a “person” under the ordinance and their responsibilities for tree removal permits were highlighted. There was consensus that the language needed refinement to prevent misinterpretation and ensure compliance with New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) regulations. The conversation included recommendations for stricter penalties for non-compliance, with fines ranging from $1,000 to $4,000, targeting unregistered tree care businesses as well as individuals.

Another topic was the ordinance’s treatment of invasive species like bamboo and Japanese lanternflies. The council discussed ensuring these species were explicitly prohibited rather than merely discouraged. The need for ongoing updates to the borough’s tree species list also emerged, with a request to ensure the website reflects current information before referencing it publicly.

Public feedback during the meeting focused on the ordinance’s potential impact on private property rights. Some residents argued for more freedom in managing their trees, criticizing the inclusion of subjective terms like “aesthetic” in the regulation. Others acknowledged the council’s efforts but urged further refinement to address minor imperfections before finalizing the ordinance.

Beyond tree preservation, the council addressed several other issues. The removal of trees for police station construction raised concerns about replacements and landscape planning. The Fair Haven Fields Advisory Committee promoted a volunteer initiative to maintain the Natural Area, and discussions about the police department’s radio system clarified that the fire department had received county radios, but none were available for police.

The meeting also touched on upcoming projects, such as an inclusive playground grant and collaboration with students on a Norwood-related initiative. Residents expressed appreciation for a recent Veterans Memorial ceremony and raised questions about “gray boxes” for street lighting, with updates indicating supply chain delays. Recycling and garbage pickup schedules were discussed in response to residents’ concerns about reduced recycling frequency due to increased contract costs and budget constraints.