A major focus of the meeting centered on the intricacies of managing Fair Haven’s sewer systems, particularly in light of the borough’s membership in the Two Rivers Water Reclamation Authority. Members highlighted the authority’s capacity to treat around ten million gallons of sewage per day. A proposal was discussed regarding the construction of a new tunnel to replace an outdated one, connecting to a sewage treatment plant on Raccoon Island. This infrastructure is essential for treating sewage to meet both national and New Jersey standards before it is discharged into the ocean. Concerns were raised about neighboring areas lacking proper sewer infrastructure, citing Colts Neck as an example, where development pressures could lead to environmental challenges. The commission emphasized the importance of equitable financial arrangements between member towns and customer towns, discussing the need for customer towns like Eatontown to fund any required infrastructure improvements.

The commission also delved into the challenges of sewer management in the face of increasing demand and potential future growth in surrounding areas. Customer towns contribute 62% of the sewer system’s flow, with concerns about them exceeding flow limits and causing issues such as saltwater intrusion. The discussion included the potential for future state regulations to impact local governance and the need to preserve existing capacity for Fair Haven’s future needs.

Tree management emerged as another significant topic, with discussions revealing an increase in tree removals since the adoption of a tree ordinance. The commission expressed concerns about the criteria for identifying “hazard trees” and the influence of builders in the removal process. A member recounted experiences with builders removing multiple trees without regard for environmental considerations. Comparisons were made with neighboring towns like Little Silver, which have established protections for trees on slopes and differentiated regulations for developers versus the general public. The commission recognized the need for a revised approach, proposing a tree canopy study to tailor goals and potentially collaborate with the Rumson Environmental Commission for a more effective strategy.

Further, the meeting addressed issues surrounding stormwater management tied to new construction projects, with members expressing concerns over drainage issues that could lead to erosion and other environmental impacts. The conversation explored the potential benefits of using gravel and other permeable solutions, emphasizing the need to revisit zoning ordinances that currently discourage such practices. Historical concerns were noted regarding wooden cesspools contaminating local waterways.

Public outreach and education initiatives were also discussed, with the commission considering the implementation of templates for announcements related to water and earth-focused activities. The development of a comprehensive map illustrating local water bodies and sewer systems was proposed. Additionally, the commission considered recommending chemical treatments for goose control, weighing the potential benefits against cost and safety concerns.