The most pressing topic was the consideration of multiple reorganization options for the district’s elementary and middle schools. Among these, “Option B” proposed a grade banding approach that would house specific grades together in designated buildings: Roosevelt for Pre-K and kindergarten, Jefferson for grades one and two, and Lincoln for grades three to five. This option aimed to improve efficiency and create environments tailored to each grade’s developmental needs. However, concerns were raised about the increased number of transitions students would face, moving between buildings every two to three years. The logistical implications of transportation also necessitated a review by experts to assess feasibility and costs.

“Option C” suggested transitioning fifth grade to the middle school, maintaining an elementary model to allow fifth graders to stay with their same teacher rather than changing classes frequently. This option also proposed closing the Alternative Learning Center (ALC) and moving it to the McKinley site, while leaving the high school unchanged. Despite initial public opposition, a community committee became more receptive after detailed explanations.

“Option D” offered a more traditional structure, keeping Roosevelt as a Pre-K and kindergarten center, and Jefferson and Lincoln housing grades one through five, with no changes to the middle or high schools. This option was seen as allowing for growth across all grade levels and addressing public perception concerns by adhering to conventional grade configurations.

“Option F” involved restructuring three elementary schools—Roosevelt, Jefferson, and Lincoln—to serve pre-kindergarten through fourth grade, with the middle school becoming a fifth-grade site. This option was noted for its potential benefits, including preserving the neighborhood school model and providing fewer transitions for students. However, it would necessitate additional operational costs of approximately $750,000 annually due to increased utilities and supplies.

Financial considerations were central to these discussions. Maintaining the status quo could only yield minor staffing reductions, saving approximately $160,000. Without reorganization, certain grades could exceed desirable class sizes, potentially reaching 35 students per class in some grades at Jefferson and Lincoln. The reorganization was seen as a way to reduce these averages to the mid-20s, thereby improving the educational environment.

Board members also examined potential budget savings and the need for a long-term perspective. The district faces a potential budget shortfall of $500,000 to $700,000 in the next fiscal year, making budget neutrality a priority. Options B, C, and D were seen as pathways to achieving this goal.

The topic of moving fifth graders to the middle school sparked debate. Concerns centered around the physical layout of the middle school, which does not allow for distinct spaces for younger students. This design challenge complicated the possibility of isolating fifth graders from older students, raising safety and developmental concerns.

Another discussion involved the potential relocation of the ALC. There was a historical context to this debate, with a previous initiative resulting in over 300 emails and calls opposing the move, leading the board to table the discussion indefinitely. Some board members expressed a desire to see all options regarding the ALC’s future, emphasizing the importance of exploring every possibility despite potential discomfort.

The superintendent clarified that no new buildings or additions would be considered due to financial constraints and emphasized the importance of reviewing options thoroughly and transparently. The board collectively recognized the need to focus on viable options rather than impractical suggestions, with members encouraged to send questions to the superintendent for public review in subsequent meetings.

The meeting also included updates from the student board representative, Julian Huberty, who provided insights on the Photo Voice Project and feedback on the school’s cell phone policy. Huberty highlighted substance abuse issues at the high school, noting the significant impact on students’ sense of safety. Superintendent Benty shared news about the Faribault Multicultural Adult Driver’s Education Program receiving a statewide award and significant donations from the University of Minnesota.

Policy discussions were another focal point, particularly regarding Policy 613 on graduation requirements and Policy 522 on Title IX procedures. Concerns were raised about state involvement in local health standards and the implications of recent legal challenges to Title IX. The board voted on these policies, passing Policy 613 by a 4-3 vote and Policy 522 with a 4-2 vote, including one abstention.

The finance committee report presented an overview of financial matters, including the approval of the school resource officer contract and the hiring of an additional kindergarten teacher. Donations to the district were also reviewed, with notable contributions from the Mayo Clinic and the Faribault Rotary Youth Services.