Grant County Board of Commissioners Advances Key Infrastructure Projects and Personnel Changes

The Grant County Board of Commissioners convened to discuss infrastructure projects, personnel changes, and contractual agreements. The meeting focused on addressing engineering necessities, hiring new staff, and clarifying contractual language with the Sheriff’s Office.

0:09A primary topic was the ongoing engineering work on County Ditch 21, which requires upsizing a crossing to a box culvert to handle increased water flow. The board agreed on the necessity of these engineering services, which are estimated to cost $39,600. They expressed hope of securing bridge bonding to ease financial burdens. Discussions also touched on previous hydraulic studies, with a consensus on ensuring compliance with state regulations to facilitate the ditch project. Additionally, the board approved a hydraulic analysis for County Road 34, with a projected cost of $7,400, to determine the appropriate size for a new culvert.

23:04In personnel matters, the board approved hiring an additional full-time Deputy Treasurer. Challenges in recruiting an Engineering Technician for the highway department led to the proposal of reclassifying the position to a Senior Engineering Technician role. This reclassification aims to attract more qualified candidates by elevating the position to a higher grade. The board unanimously approved this reclassification.

Contractual discussions with the Sheriff’s Office also took center stage, particularly regarding enforcement responsibilities in the city of Hoffman. Concerns were raised about the contract’s language, specifically its clarity on enforcing vehicle licensing ordinances. While the contract aligned with previous agreements, a commissioner highlighted the need for explicit terms to avoid confusion about the Sheriff’s duties. The board acknowledged the importance of delineating responsibilities while ensuring that agreements are properly established and adhered to.

40:25Solid waste management contracts were another significant agenda item. The board approved extending a contract to facilitate the procurement of recycling containers, emphasizing the need for formal agreements to support necessary expenditures. Attention was also given to “problem materials” not accepted at Pope Douglas Landfill, such as rubber mats and large plastic toys. A proposed amendment would allow these materials to be sent to Gwinner Landfill, which accepts a broader range of items. The board approved this amendment to streamline waste management processes and prevent improper disposal.

The board discussed transitioning to a volume-based fee system for rural waste routes, addressing current inconsistencies and inequities in the flat fee structure. By analyzing different disposal practices, the board aims to ensure fair treatment for all residents. This initiative reflects a broader strategy to enhance waste management practices across the county, with stakeholder meetings anticipated as part of the analysis.

Additionally, a grant for a construction and demolition study was mentioned, highlighting efforts to secure $300,000 to evaluate solid waste management across a nine-county area. This study is expected to provide valuable insights into regional waste management challenges.

1:10:45The board also considered the replacement of aging computers for county commissioners, with discussions centered on establishing a policy to replace 20% of computers annually. Concerns about unsupported software and budgetary implications were raised, with one commissioner noting potential vulnerabilities associated with outdated systems. The board expressed a willingness to initiate a structured replacement schedule, balancing immediate needs with long-term planning.

Lastly, the board addressed an application from Logan Township for American Rescue Plan Act funds, approving the application with the assurance that funds would not be used for debt payment or retirement benefits. An indemnification agreement was required as part of the application process to ensure procedural compliance before fund disbursement.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly: