The most notable topic at the meeting was the emphasis on DEI training for educators. A speaker highlighted the necessity of creating an environment where all students feel valued, regardless of their background. The breakdown of DEI was explained: diversity includes differences such as race and gender; equity focuses on fairness; and inclusion is about ensuring everyone feels welcomed. The speaker likened DEI to gardening, suggesting that understanding how to care for each student, despite differences, is essential for a thriving educational environment. This perspective was met with some debate, as another speaker urged consideration of multiple viewpoints on DEI, referencing potential divisiveness based on the experiences of other organizations.

In addition to the DEI discussion, the board focused on the district advisory committee, emphasizing its role in community engagement and curriculum planning. The necessity of defining the committee’s objectives and membership was underscored, with plans to discuss these details further in the December meeting. The advisory committee is expected to reflect the district’s diversity, including stakeholders such as teachers, parents, and students, to ensure effective participation. The board debated past challenges with similar groups, focusing on crafting a clear purpose to avoid previous pitfalls.

A related topic was the potential establishment of a PTA, aimed at enhancing school culture and supporting teachers. The discussion acknowledged the distinct roles of a PTA compared to the advisory committee, with the former focused on boosting school morale and the latter on broader educational issues.

The meeting also highlighted the importance of communication strategies to counter misinformation. Instances of misinformation circulating in the community were addressed, particularly concerning student surveys. Clarifications were provided to ensure transparency, with a strategy proposed to send out direct communications to address concerns and maintain trust within the community.

Furthermore, the board reviewed the district’s academic performance and student engagement. A presentation by a high school data coach revealed that 63.6% of students maintained a GPA above 2.8, and 46.7% completed college credit courses. Concerns were raised about ninth-grade attendance, with data showing a strong correlation between attendance at this level and future academic success. The board also discussed financial aspects of the concurrent enrollment program, which allows students to earn college credits, saving substantial amounts in college fees.

Extracurricular activities were another focus, with robust student participation noted. Only two students were not involved in any of the thirty-plus available options. Recent events, such as a successful Junior High Ag Day and a Veterans Day program, were praised for their community engagement.

The board also examined budget management concerns, specifically regarding federal program expenditures. Preparations for the upcoming Truth in Taxation meeting were discussed, with the finance committee expected to address budget discrepancies. Additionally, the board is preparing for a superintendent search, planning logistics, and timelines for the process.

Efforts to modernize district policies were discussed, with a focus on the foundational 100s category. The policy committee is tasked with reviewing these policies, with a month-long public review scheduled. The goal is to approve these updates without further discussion in December.