The proposed development site, located near a train station, is considered prime for multifamily housing, with plans for approximately 70 townhouse units spread over 8 to 12 acres. The ordinance outlines that a minimum of 20% of these units would be allocated for sale as affordable housing, with 15% designated for rental. Additionally, it requires a minimum age of 62 for affordable units and 55 for market-rate units. However, the proposal has sparked concern among residents, particularly regarding potential flooding and increased traffic.

Residents expressed significant apprehension about the flooding issues in the area, exacerbated by recent constructions. A resident named Mark MacG shared personal experiences with flooding, citing the outdated storm sewer system’s inability to handle current rainfall levels. In response, a representative assured that any future development would need to comply with new drainage regulations aimed at reducing water flow from the site. The ordinance mandates that at least 40% of the property be retained as green space to mitigate these impacts, although some residents remain skeptical about the effectiveness of these measures.

Traffic concerns were also a focal point of the public comments. Mark Robinson, another resident, voiced worries about increased traffic congestion and the potential for light pollution from the proposed development. He recounted near-miss incidents while entering his driveway and noted the disruptive impact of lighting from new constructions. In response, provisions were outlined in the ordinance, including requirements for a double row of evergreen plant material around the site and shielded lighting to minimize these impacts.

Additional community concerns included noise pollution from nearby freight trains and the potential displacement of local wildlife due to new constructions. Residents called for substantial buffer zones to absorb noise and protect existing habitats. The importance of environmental studies to assess the impact of new developments was highlighted, with assurances given that residents within a 200-foot radius of any proposed development site would be notified about upcoming plans.

The Council also discussed the borough’s efforts to enhance local infrastructure and meet housing needs through a public hearing on a grant application for the Bergen County Open Space Recreation Floodplain Protection Farmland Historic Preservation Trust Fund. The Borough is seeking a matching grant of approximately $17,500 to fund improvements to Finch Park, focusing on installing permanent energy-efficient field lighting to replace outdated, diesel-powered temporary lights.

As the grant application discussion unfolded, a resident inquired whether the new lighting would extend to the pickleball courts. This initiative aligns with efforts to enhance accessibility and reduce noise pollution from temporary lighting solutions.

Council members also addressed other key agenda items, such as the adoption of ordinance 072025, which amends the borough code to establish liability insurance and registration requirements for owners of rental units. This ordinance aligns with state law S-1368 and includes administrative fees and penalties for non-compliance. The Council unanimously approved this ordinance after a public hearing with no public comments.

The meeting included updates from various committees, with Councilman Gutwetter highlighting new digital content formats introduced by the library board and the success of the Friends of the Ramsey Library jewelry sale. Councilwoman Cusick reported on a cleanup day organized by the environmental commission and ongoing lead service line replacement projects. Meanwhile, Councilwoman Poppe discussed preparations for Mental Health Awareness Month and reminded residents about early bird registration for the municipal pool.