River Edge Land Use Board Discusses Garage Renovation and Zoning Changes

In a recent meeting, the River Edge Land Use Board addressed a variety of topics, with discussions centering on Suzanne LaQuet’s application to replace her existing garage with a new one and proposed changes to zoning ordinances and lot coverage regulations. The meeting saw debate on the aesthetic and functional implications of the garage renovation and the broader impact of zoning changes on town infrastructure, particularly flood mitigation.

Suzanne LaQuet’s application for a new garage was a focal point of the meeting. She presented her case for a two-car garage replacement, which included a detailed explanation of the design choices, such as the need for a pitched roof with skylights. The board scrutinized the proposed height, the impact on lot coverage, and the potential effects on neighboring properties. Concerns were raised by a resident, Sam Caputo, who questioned the size, height, and placement of the structure, emphasizing the potential for storm drainage issues and water runoff.

The board also engaged in a examination of proposed zoning narrative changes. These changes involved renaming lot coverage to building coverage, creating a new term for “lot coverage,” and considering an increase in maximum garage height to 15 feet. The need to clarify language around accessory buildings and structures was discussed, with the suggestion to form a subcommittee to refine the proposed changes.

Additionally, the members debated the introduction of a 5% yard amenity requirement within lot coverage for single-family homes. This sparked discussions on the placement and screening of generators, the possible imposition of restrictions on property renovations, and the designation of front and side yards for corner lots. The mayor highlighted the urgency of addressing flooding issues, urging the board to send the ordinance to the council.

The meeting also tackled the percentage of allowable lot coverage for decks and patios, with concerns that the proposed 5% might be insufficient for smaller lots. The potential increase in variance requests and the impact on homeowners were considered, along with the effect of increased coverage on flooding. Some members suggested a 37% total lot coverage inclusive of the 5% for decks and patios, while others favored a 35% cap to mitigate flood risks.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: