The council’s most pressing topic involved a zoning map amendment for the Clark property, shifting its designation from agricultural to R-1B single-family dwelling. This proposed change sparked debate among residents who voiced concerns about potential exacerbation of existing drainage and traffic issues. Sam Dues, representing the homeowners association for Michigan Estate Circle, highlighted current drainage problems, noting that intensified development could worsen flooding, especially with ongoing construction in the area. Dues stated, “It doesn’t take a hurricane anymore to experience flooding,” attributing these challenges to increased impervious surfaces from new developments.

Jerome Feric, another local resident, echoed Dues’ concerns, pointing out problematic flooding conditions on Michigan Avenue, particularly during rainstorms. Feric stressed the importance of considering comprehensive drainage strategies, arguing that new developments without thorough assessment could lead to severe repercussions. He provided visual evidence to support his claims, highlighting the potential dangers of increased traffic and flooding.

In response to these concerns, a representative of the development team, Jesse Anderson, clarified that the zoning amendment was in preliminary stages and that detailed transportation and drainage plans would be addressed during the subdivision construction plan phase. City council members expressed agreement with the residents’ concerns, emphasizing the need for plans before approval. A council member pointed out that while preliminary plans were not typically required at the zoning stage, given the nature of the project, a more detailed review was necessary. The council ultimately decided to continue the matter to a future date, allowing the applicant to provide the necessary information.

The council also addressed a resolution on the fiscal year 2024-2025 budget. Introduced by the Finance Director, the total revenue for the upcoming fiscal year is projected at $273.5 million, with $80.8 million allocated to the general fund. Notably, the budget reflects a 1% decrease in operating costs, a rare occurrence amid rising living expenses nationwide. Council members expressed appreciation for this achievement, particularly in funding key public safety projects, including two new fire stations and a public safety complex. The budget resolution was unanimously passed, signaling strong support for these initiatives.

Additionally, the meeting included discussions on the city’s ad valorem tax millage rate for the upcoming fiscal year. The proposed millage rate was to remain the same at 7.69% above the rolled-back rate of 4.74. The Finance Director explained the calculation process and provided historical context, indicating that a property valued at $250,000 would incur an average yearly tax cost of approximately $1,278. The justification for maintaining the current millage rate was linked to rising personnel costs and the addition of new positions within the city. The council prepared for a subsequent vote on this matter at the next meeting.

A significant portion of the meeting also revolved around the annexation of certain properties into the city. Residents expressed strong opposition to being annexed, citing concerns about additional taxes and a preference to remain in the county. Ron and Rafael Dorta voiced their objections, emphasizing their long-standing residency and questioning the benefits of annexation. The council acknowledged these concerns but emphasized the necessity for residents benefiting from city services to contribute to the tax base. A motion to approve the annexation passed with a vote of 4-1.

The council also considered a conditional use permit application for the JJCC Assembly of God church located on Eastern Avenue. The application proposed constructing a new building for worship services and converting the existing structure for school use. Residents raised concerns about traffic and parking issues associated with the existing school and the potential impact of the new building. In response, the applicant’s representative assured that the new building would include 71 parking spaces and that traffic from church services and school operations would occur at different times, thereby reducing congestion. The council decided to continue the item for further review, allowing the applicant to refine their proposal.