The meeting commenced with a discussion about Bakitarian’s property on Passway, which was found in violation of the city’s short-term rental ordinances. Evidence included screenshots of VRBO advertisements, showing the property exceeded the allowable three rentals per year. Bakitarian argued that his property should be grandfathered due to his long-standing rental history dating back to 1994, before the 2016 ordinance changes. Despite submitting necessary documentation, he expressed frustration over the lack of communication from the city, which has yet to confirm his grandfathered status.

The magistrate acknowledged the processing delays and encouraged Bakitarian to follow up with the city to clarify his application status. The case was continued to the November hearing, allowing Bakitarian time to resolve the application process and avoid the proposed fines of $4,500 plus administrative costs. The magistrate emphasized the importance of confirming his grandfathered status to prevent further violations.

In addition to Bakitarian’s case, several other property compliance matters were addressed. A notable case involved Trisha Figgins at 43479th Avenue, where the city pointed out ongoing overgrowth despite improvements, such as the removal of a toilet from the front yard. The magistrate allowed Figgins a 14-day period to bring her property into full compliance, with a status check scheduled for the next month.

Another discussion revolved around the property on Bokea Drive. This case involved violations for overgrown vegetation and unregistered vehicles, including an expired boat trailer and scooter. The magistrate imposed a fine of $250 per day starting from the date of the order, along with administrative costs, granting a 14-day compliance period.

The meeting also highlighted the challenges faced by property owners post-disaster. For instance, Mr. Starkus appeared to explain extensive hurricane damage to his property, which had stalled his compliance efforts. Despite his efforts to work with an uncooperative insurance company, the magistrate reiterated the necessity for compliance and imposed fines from September 16, 2025, alongside administrative fees.

Marilyn Rhymar’s case on Paliway was one of compliance success, with the city confirming she had obtained necessary permits and erected a construction fence, thus avoiding fines but incurring a $330 administrative fee. Similarly, Sunold LLC’s properties achieved compliance through lawn care and fence repairs, incurring only combined administrative costs.

In contrast, other property owners struggled to meet compliance deadlines. For instance, Kenneth Hutman faced daily fines for unresolved retaining wall issues, and Scott and Lisa Shamming were recommended for fines due to a lingering driveway permit issue. Despite efforts, these properties remained non-compliant.