Father Sean’s proposal outlined a rectory situated on Highland Street, featuring suites for priests, a chapel, and a kitchen. The design was met with scrutiny, particularly regarding the architectural style, which deviates from the Victorian Queen Anne style of the original rectory, built between 1860 and 1890. The commission debated the potential architectural conflict, with some members advocating for a blend of styles that respect the historic character of the area while meeting modern needs.

Financial concerns loomed large as the commission examined the costs associated with reconstructing a historically accurate building. Price estimates ranged from $2.9 million to $4 million, figures that representatives deemed unfeasible. There was discussion about the possibility of pursuing a certificate of hardship to allow some flexibility in compliance with historical guidelines, given the church’s financial constraints.

The commission discussed the historical significance of the original structure and the implications of replacing it with a colonial design. One participant emphasized the importance of maintaining architectural integrity, stating, “Our goal, our mission as the commission, is to preserve the historic architectural features of the buildings in our district.” This sentiment underscored the commission’s dedication to preserving the town’s heritage while accommodating modern requirements.

Concerns about insurance coverage following the fire were also raised, with some questioning whether the church’s policy was adequate for a like-for-like replacement. The complexities of insurance policies and their impact on the project’s feasibility were acknowledged, with the need for further examination to ensure the church could proceed within budgetary limits.

The commission agreed that public engagement would be crucial, with plans for a public hearing to gather community input. The timing and format of the hearing were debated, with proposals for both in-person and online surveys to gauge public sentiment. A consensus emerged that engaging an architect with expertise in period-appropriate designs would be beneficial to ensure that the new building complements the historic context.

Beyond the rectory proposal, the commission touched on logistical matters, such as scheduling future meetings and public hearings, ultimately deciding on 7 PM as the standard time to accommodate public participation. Additionally, there were discussions about community engagement through social activities.