05:28The board meeting centered on the proposed transition from an aging water tower to a modern monopole structure, a necessity following American Water’s decision to decommission the current water sphere that supports antennas for major carriers. David Kenny, counsel for CX Towers and T-Mobile, stressed the urgency of maintaining service continuity, noting that the new monopole would match the antenna center height of the existing structure. This strategic move aims to prevent any service gaps during the transition period.

08:12Several professionals, including an RF engineer and a project planner, provided comprehensive insights into the project. The engineering plan, detailed by Edward Ameli, outlined a site plan adhering to New Jersey building codes and included security measures such as a six-foot chain-link fence. The proposed monopole’s location, northeast of the current water structure, was chosen to preserve service levels and ensure compliance with telecommunications standards.

25:06As the board assessed the monopole’s potential impact, questions arose about the absence of letters of support from Verizon and AT&T, both of which currently utilize the existing water tower. Kenny clarified that while Verizon had expressed intent to relocate, documentation was not yet submitted. Discussions with AT&T were ongoing, and both carriers could apply to install equipment on the new structure once operational.

19:21The board also explored the technological benefits of the new monopole. The facility promises improved antenna positioning and greater capacity, which will enhance service quality. Daniel, an RF engineer for T-Mobile, elaborated on the technical specifications, noting that the proposed monopole at 147 feet would not only restore but potentially enhance wireless coverage.

32:05Beyond technical functionality, the board considered the monopole’s aesthetic impact. Photo simulations, using drone technology, depicted the tower at 150 feet—taller than the existing water sphere. However, the simulations demonstrated a reduced visual impact due to existing tree cover and other structures, with minimal visibility from residential streets. The board acknowledged that the new monopole would likely be less obtrusive than the current water tower, which stands at approximately 210 feet.

26:27Paul Ricky, a professional planner, provided testimony on the necessity of a D1 use variance, which was required due to the site’s expansion into a non-conforming use. He highlighted the historical telecommunications use at the site and its alignment with zoning regulations.

The board members deliberated over the monopole’s necessity and benefits. One member appreciated the comprehensive testimony and concluded that the negative impacts were minimal compared to the benefits. Another member emphasized the suitability of the site for the installation and expressed confidence in the project’s advantages.

The meeting briefly touched on the emotional attachment to the existing water tower, a long-standing community fixture. Despite this sentiment, the board recognized the necessity of the new monopole, given the directive to decommission the current structure.

41:45After a review of evidence and testimony, the board reached a consensus. A motion was made to grant the variance necessary for the application, which was seconded and approved unanimously. The board will prepare a resolution consistent with this decision, with a scheduled meeting for final adoption.

03:01In other business, the board handled a routine request from Jeb Foods LLC for a one-year extension to perfect a previously approved subdivision on Indiana Street. The board attorney confirmed the request was standard, and the extension was granted without objection.